a + (b - c). search. Negationis the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Section 4.4.2, Figure 4.1). It applies the function on its left to the value on its right. Having precedence and associativity rules in addition to grammar can be messy. Also note that, since we explicitly defined operator precedence above the data type declaration, we can write expressions without parentheses … Cabal; ghc is the official Haskell compiler. Parsing of Strings, producing values.. The rule is simple: application binds more tightly than any infix operation. In Haskell the precedence of an ordinary function call (white space, usually) is of 10. 1 Quick start. Hoogle is a Haskell API search engine, which allows you to search the Haskell libraries on Stackage by either function name, or by approximate type signature. k-infix is a simple Haskell-like infix expression parser. I Note than function application has higher precedence than any infix operator. placeholder for the precedence of our prefix negation rule. We can apply this function in two ways: f 5 6, or, using infix notation, 5 `f` 6. In this case we know that the … ... operator has the lowest precedence, so you need to parenthesize. I'm guessing that an infix operator is really a > function, and an infix constructor I don't know what it is. Negation is the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Figure 2). Enter your own search at the top of the page. The keywords infixl, infix, and infixr declare associativity as left-, non-, or right- respectively. In the last few weeks, we’ve taken a good look at GHC. No weirdness there: Haskell defines a bunch of infix operators like +, -, *, /, etc. 4.9. Haskell has a neat solution for dealing with operators/infix. At first glance this operator appears redundant, since ordinary application (f x) means the same as (f $ x). Haskell allows users to define their own infix operators, even with their own precedence. A function operates on the input parameters and returns a result. The handling of the prefix negation operator, @-@, complicates matters only slightly. > An "infix operator" is literally a normal function with a … Do the operator rules apply to this last expression? Precedence. $\begingroup$ @Mike I'm still figuring that out. My main concern with liberal use of operators is the ability to specify custom fixity (operator associativity and precedence). But Haskell has built-in lists with syntactic sugar Instead of List Integer, the type is written [Integer] Instead of Cons, the constructor is called : and is infix; Instead of Nil, the empty list is called [] oneTwoThree = 1: 2: 3: []:: [Integer] But there are even more convenient syntaxes for the same list: Infix binary operators have names consisting of special characters. Processing proceeds as follows: 1. Typically, a functional program is organised around a tree-like data structure with an algebraic data type that represents the core data. If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then showsPrec will produce infix applications of the constructor. haskell documentation: Binding precedence. Most languages use infix notation; 5 + 4; Forth uses postfix notation 5 4 + Lisp uses prefix notation + 5 4. I can work around it with extra parenthesis, of course. The standard precedence and associativity rules apply: 11 Integer. [ End of If ] If a right parenthesis is encountered ,then : 4.9. What precedence will this application have? Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence can only occur once (i.e. Infix Operators. Haskell famously allows the definition of custom infix operators, an extremely useful language feature although this poses a bit of a challenge to parse! The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Come on, parsing infix (precedence and all) is ridiculously … See. mod x y = x `mod` … Haskell: Functions —Defining Functions & Operators [1/3] To define a Haskell function, write what looks like a call to the function, an equals sign, and then an expression for what the function returns. prefix minus resolution This page outlines a design for the "unresolved infix expressions" feature requested in #4430 (closed).Parts of this page are copied from the ticket. Precedence. The issue is the sitemap definition on line 39, but GHC is happily accepting it since it knows the precedence of the (<>) and () operators from boomerang. Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence associate to the left (i.e. My question is why. Contributing to GHC 4: Real Issues. Haskell allows infix operators to act as data constructors, which allows us to express algebraic expressions cleanly and concisely without too much mental parsing. There's a discussion about parameter descriptions in haskell-servant/servant-swagger#62. First we group the application div 2 3, … You now can set the precedence and associativity of custom infix operators. This version can be pinned in stack with:show-combinators-0.2.0.0@sha256:5d7a36c6383c9eff1dc15970da3206a05b50c2d1e93155970ffcf240eaa57d58,1277 An out-of-line declaration indicates infix precedence levels and types (well, at least out-of-line for "normal" datums). If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then the derived Read instance will parse only infix applications of the constructor (not the prefix form). Install the Haskell Platform or cabal + ghc. Spalding Ultimate Basketball All Surface, Basketball Stat Sheet Pdf, Floyd Mayweather Wallpaper, Elevator Maintenance Quotation Format, The Lost Tomb Of Alexander The Great National Geographic, Belmont Abbey Calendar Fall 2021, Selective Continuation Army 2020, Sentences With Then And Than, Iop Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science Scopus Index, 2019 Oakland A's Schedule, Seven Deadly Sins Demon Colors, " /> a + (b - c). search. Negationis the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Section 4.4.2, Figure 4.1). It applies the function on its left to the value on its right. Having precedence and associativity rules in addition to grammar can be messy. Also note that, since we explicitly defined operator precedence above the data type declaration, we can write expressions without parentheses … Cabal; ghc is the official Haskell compiler. Parsing of Strings, producing values.. The rule is simple: application binds more tightly than any infix operation. In Haskell the precedence of an ordinary function call (white space, usually) is of 10. 1 Quick start. Hoogle is a Haskell API search engine, which allows you to search the Haskell libraries on Stackage by either function name, or by approximate type signature. k-infix is a simple Haskell-like infix expression parser. I Note than function application has higher precedence than any infix operator. placeholder for the precedence of our prefix negation rule. We can apply this function in two ways: f 5 6, or, using infix notation, 5 `f` 6. In this case we know that the … ... operator has the lowest precedence, so you need to parenthesize. I'm guessing that an infix operator is really a > function, and an infix constructor I don't know what it is. Negation is the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Figure 2). Enter your own search at the top of the page. The keywords infixl, infix, and infixr declare associativity as left-, non-, or right- respectively. In the last few weeks, we’ve taken a good look at GHC. No weirdness there: Haskell defines a bunch of infix operators like +, -, *, /, etc. 4.9. Haskell has a neat solution for dealing with operators/infix. At first glance this operator appears redundant, since ordinary application (f x) means the same as (f $ x). Haskell allows users to define their own infix operators, even with their own precedence. A function operates on the input parameters and returns a result. The handling of the prefix negation operator, @-@, complicates matters only slightly. > An "infix operator" is literally a normal function with a … Do the operator rules apply to this last expression? Precedence. $\begingroup$ @Mike I'm still figuring that out. My main concern with liberal use of operators is the ability to specify custom fixity (operator associativity and precedence). But Haskell has built-in lists with syntactic sugar Instead of List Integer, the type is written [Integer] Instead of Cons, the constructor is called : and is infix; Instead of Nil, the empty list is called [] oneTwoThree = 1: 2: 3: []:: [Integer] But there are even more convenient syntaxes for the same list: Infix binary operators have names consisting of special characters. Processing proceeds as follows: 1. Typically, a functional program is organised around a tree-like data structure with an algebraic data type that represents the core data. If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then showsPrec will produce infix applications of the constructor. haskell documentation: Binding precedence. Most languages use infix notation; 5 + 4; Forth uses postfix notation 5 4 + Lisp uses prefix notation + 5 4. I can work around it with extra parenthesis, of course. The standard precedence and associativity rules apply: 11 Integer. [ End of If ] If a right parenthesis is encountered ,then : 4.9. What precedence will this application have? Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence can only occur once (i.e. Infix Operators. Haskell famously allows the definition of custom infix operators, an extremely useful language feature although this poses a bit of a challenge to parse! The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Come on, parsing infix (precedence and all) is ridiculously … See. mod x y = x `mod` … Haskell: Functions —Defining Functions & Operators [1/3] To define a Haskell function, write what looks like a call to the function, an equals sign, and then an expression for what the function returns. prefix minus resolution This page outlines a design for the "unresolved infix expressions" feature requested in #4430 (closed).Parts of this page are copied from the ticket. Precedence. The issue is the sitemap definition on line 39, but GHC is happily accepting it since it knows the precedence of the (<>) and () operators from boomerang. Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence associate to the left (i.e. My question is why. Contributing to GHC 4: Real Issues. Haskell allows infix operators to act as data constructors, which allows us to express algebraic expressions cleanly and concisely without too much mental parsing. There's a discussion about parameter descriptions in haskell-servant/servant-swagger#62. First we group the application div 2 3, … You now can set the precedence and associativity of custom infix operators. This version can be pinned in stack with:show-combinators-0.2.0.0@sha256:5d7a36c6383c9eff1dc15970da3206a05b50c2d1e93155970ffcf240eaa57d58,1277 An out-of-line declaration indicates infix precedence levels and types (well, at least out-of-line for "normal" datums). If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then the derived Read instance will parse only infix applications of the constructor (not the prefix form). Install the Haskell Platform or cabal + ghc. Spalding Ultimate Basketball All Surface, Basketball Stat Sheet Pdf, Floyd Mayweather Wallpaper, Elevator Maintenance Quotation Format, The Lost Tomb Of Alexander The Great National Geographic, Belmont Abbey Calendar Fall 2021, Selective Continuation Army 2020, Sentences With Then And Than, Iop Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science Scopus Index, 2019 Oakland A's Schedule, Seven Deadly Sins Demon Colors, " /> a + (b - c). search. Negationis the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Section 4.4.2, Figure 4.1). It applies the function on its left to the value on its right. Having precedence and associativity rules in addition to grammar can be messy. Also note that, since we explicitly defined operator precedence above the data type declaration, we can write expressions without parentheses … Cabal; ghc is the official Haskell compiler. Parsing of Strings, producing values.. The rule is simple: application binds more tightly than any infix operation. In Haskell the precedence of an ordinary function call (white space, usually) is of 10. 1 Quick start. Hoogle is a Haskell API search engine, which allows you to search the Haskell libraries on Stackage by either function name, or by approximate type signature. k-infix is a simple Haskell-like infix expression parser. I Note than function application has higher precedence than any infix operator. placeholder for the precedence of our prefix negation rule. We can apply this function in two ways: f 5 6, or, using infix notation, 5 `f` 6. In this case we know that the … ... operator has the lowest precedence, so you need to parenthesize. I'm guessing that an infix operator is really a > function, and an infix constructor I don't know what it is. Negation is the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Figure 2). Enter your own search at the top of the page. The keywords infixl, infix, and infixr declare associativity as left-, non-, or right- respectively. In the last few weeks, we’ve taken a good look at GHC. No weirdness there: Haskell defines a bunch of infix operators like +, -, *, /, etc. 4.9. Haskell has a neat solution for dealing with operators/infix. At first glance this operator appears redundant, since ordinary application (f x) means the same as (f $ x). Haskell allows users to define their own infix operators, even with their own precedence. A function operates on the input parameters and returns a result. The handling of the prefix negation operator, @-@, complicates matters only slightly. > An "infix operator" is literally a normal function with a … Do the operator rules apply to this last expression? Precedence. $\begingroup$ @Mike I'm still figuring that out. My main concern with liberal use of operators is the ability to specify custom fixity (operator associativity and precedence). But Haskell has built-in lists with syntactic sugar Instead of List Integer, the type is written [Integer] Instead of Cons, the constructor is called : and is infix; Instead of Nil, the empty list is called [] oneTwoThree = 1: 2: 3: []:: [Integer] But there are even more convenient syntaxes for the same list: Infix binary operators have names consisting of special characters. Processing proceeds as follows: 1. Typically, a functional program is organised around a tree-like data structure with an algebraic data type that represents the core data. If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then showsPrec will produce infix applications of the constructor. haskell documentation: Binding precedence. Most languages use infix notation; 5 + 4; Forth uses postfix notation 5 4 + Lisp uses prefix notation + 5 4. I can work around it with extra parenthesis, of course. The standard precedence and associativity rules apply: 11 Integer. [ End of If ] If a right parenthesis is encountered ,then : 4.9. What precedence will this application have? Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence can only occur once (i.e. Infix Operators. Haskell famously allows the definition of custom infix operators, an extremely useful language feature although this poses a bit of a challenge to parse! The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Come on, parsing infix (precedence and all) is ridiculously … See. mod x y = x `mod` … Haskell: Functions —Defining Functions & Operators [1/3] To define a Haskell function, write what looks like a call to the function, an equals sign, and then an expression for what the function returns. prefix minus resolution This page outlines a design for the "unresolved infix expressions" feature requested in #4430 (closed).Parts of this page are copied from the ticket. Precedence. The issue is the sitemap definition on line 39, but GHC is happily accepting it since it knows the precedence of the (<>) and () operators from boomerang. Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence associate to the left (i.e. My question is why. Contributing to GHC 4: Real Issues. Haskell allows infix operators to act as data constructors, which allows us to express algebraic expressions cleanly and concisely without too much mental parsing. There's a discussion about parameter descriptions in haskell-servant/servant-swagger#62. First we group the application div 2 3, … You now can set the precedence and associativity of custom infix operators. This version can be pinned in stack with:show-combinators-0.2.0.0@sha256:5d7a36c6383c9eff1dc15970da3206a05b50c2d1e93155970ffcf240eaa57d58,1277 An out-of-line declaration indicates infix precedence levels and types (well, at least out-of-line for "normal" datums). If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then the derived Read instance will parse only infix applications of the constructor (not the prefix form). Install the Haskell Platform or cabal + ghc. Spalding Ultimate Basketball All Surface, Basketball Stat Sheet Pdf, Floyd Mayweather Wallpaper, Elevator Maintenance Quotation Format, The Lost Tomb Of Alexander The Great National Geographic, Belmont Abbey Calendar Fall 2021, Selective Continuation Army 2020, Sentences With Then And Than, Iop Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science Scopus Index, 2019 Oakland A's Schedule, Seven Deadly Sins Demon Colors, " />
To Top
Kezdőlap
Close
Bemutatkozás
Szakterület
Partnerek
Kapcsolat
13
jún 2021
No Comments
Egyéb
Permalink

haskell infix precedence

When you make a prefix function, such as id infix by backticking it but don’t otherwise specify the associativity and precedence for its infix use, it defaults to left-associativity and a precedence of 9, making it the same precedence as function composition but lower (by one) than normal prefix function application. Is it just another form of function application, and so will it also have the highest precedence? pairIfNeeded :: Semigroup s => IsString s => Pair -> ( Infix , Side ) -> Infix -> s -> s Source # When you write an arithmetic expression such as B * C, the form of the expression provides you with information so that you can interpret it correctly. k-infix makes writing infix expressions in Racket easy. It’s extensible as one can add operators freely. Yet, Rust is a rather different language, so … Left and right -associativity are also supported. This would force the use of parentheses in cases where the operator name designers did not anticipate a certain combination of infix operators. Add operator to Stack. For example, consider the following fixity declarations (in base) - Anyone can define their own operators and set their precedence. Thus add3 1 n + 1 3 parses as (add3 1 n) + (1 3). ... Once again, in Coq, we can define our own infix operators and give them precedence levels (from 0–99, mostly) and associativities. All infix applications are thus parsed as if the operators were all left associative with the same precedence. I love the infix operator notation in Haskell, partially because not all mathematical operators to *, +, etc. I'll demonstrate it in a simple example, but first let's talk a little about arithmetics. Thus, a precedence analysis of 1 + div 2 3 + 4 proceeds as follows. Another important thing to know is that function application has the strongest binding power. ), i.e. it takes a single argument. There’s one crucial exception to the rule: Normal function application (i.e., space) has precedence of 10, which is higher than the maximum definable precedence for custom infix operators. Haskell uses both λ-calculus style prefix notation, and ordinary mathematical operators. The only exception is infix functions like + which are written between their arguments, though surrounding them in parentheses makes them act like normal functions. 3. I love Haskell's lack of parentheses on function calls too though. Hello World. I'll demonstrate it in a simple example, but first let's talk a little about arithmetics. if DSL can be parsed by extending host language parse, its much more convenient to use As I said in my prelude , there are languages in which these operations are represented by special operators and languages in which they are … The Haskell parser does not consider the fixity of operators when parsing infix applications. This means functions in Haskell behave closer to mathematical functions. For each operator we need to specify its precedence and associativity. See, binary operators are what we call infix, which means that they go in between their arguments. The precedences and associativities of infix symbols in expressions are determined by their first character (s): symbols beginning with ** have highest precedence (exponentiation), followed by symbols beginning with * , … "Precedence" is a red herring: The precedence of +-*/ is fixed, you can easily place "all others" in one (or two) categories). k-infix is a simple Haskell-like infix expression parser. For example: -1. Operators of the same scope and precedence will be evaluated from left-to-right. Haskell and Coq both disallow these sorts of shenanigans – but differently – while Agda allows this sort of mixing of associativities. For example, the usual rules for associativity say that we perform operations from left to right, so … lec05.pdf - Principles of Programming Languages Functional Programming IV Operators and Types Operators \u2022 Haskell provides a large set of infix Given Precedence and Associativity of its parent operator, and the operand Side it is in, return whether an Infix operator needs to be enclosed by a Pair. In order to parse infix expressions correctly, the compiler must know the precedence and fixity of each operator. After that, we looked at the basic way of creating a … Precedence can be overridden by using parentheses, such that a + b - c <> a + (b - c). search. Negationis the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Section 4.4.2, Figure 4.1). It applies the function on its left to the value on its right. Having precedence and associativity rules in addition to grammar can be messy. Also note that, since we explicitly defined operator precedence above the data type declaration, we can write expressions without parentheses … Cabal; ghc is the official Haskell compiler. Parsing of Strings, producing values.. The rule is simple: application binds more tightly than any infix operation. In Haskell the precedence of an ordinary function call (white space, usually) is of 10. 1 Quick start. Hoogle is a Haskell API search engine, which allows you to search the Haskell libraries on Stackage by either function name, or by approximate type signature. k-infix is a simple Haskell-like infix expression parser. I Note than function application has higher precedence than any infix operator. placeholder for the precedence of our prefix negation rule. We can apply this function in two ways: f 5 6, or, using infix notation, 5 `f` 6. In this case we know that the … ... operator has the lowest precedence, so you need to parenthesize. I'm guessing that an infix operator is really a > function, and an infix constructor I don't know what it is. Negation is the only prefix operator in Haskell; it has the same precedence as the infix -operator defined in the Prelude (see Figure 2). Enter your own search at the top of the page. The keywords infixl, infix, and infixr declare associativity as left-, non-, or right- respectively. In the last few weeks, we’ve taken a good look at GHC. No weirdness there: Haskell defines a bunch of infix operators like +, -, *, /, etc. 4.9. Haskell has a neat solution for dealing with operators/infix. At first glance this operator appears redundant, since ordinary application (f x) means the same as (f $ x). Haskell allows users to define their own infix operators, even with their own precedence. A function operates on the input parameters and returns a result. The handling of the prefix negation operator, @-@, complicates matters only slightly. > An "infix operator" is literally a normal function with a … Do the operator rules apply to this last expression? Precedence. $\begingroup$ @Mike I'm still figuring that out. My main concern with liberal use of operators is the ability to specify custom fixity (operator associativity and precedence). But Haskell has built-in lists with syntactic sugar Instead of List Integer, the type is written [Integer] Instead of Cons, the constructor is called : and is infix; Instead of Nil, the empty list is called [] oneTwoThree = 1: 2: 3: []:: [Integer] But there are even more convenient syntaxes for the same list: Infix binary operators have names consisting of special characters. Processing proceeds as follows: 1. Typically, a functional program is organised around a tree-like data structure with an algebraic data type that represents the core data. If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then showsPrec will produce infix applications of the constructor. haskell documentation: Binding precedence. Most languages use infix notation; 5 + 4; Forth uses postfix notation 5 4 + Lisp uses prefix notation + 5 4. I can work around it with extra parenthesis, of course. The standard precedence and associativity rules apply: 11 Integer. [ End of If ] If a right parenthesis is encountered ,then : 4.9. What precedence will this application have? Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence can only occur once (i.e. Infix Operators. Haskell famously allows the definition of custom infix operators, an extremely useful language feature although this poses a bit of a challenge to parse! The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Come on, parsing infix (precedence and all) is ridiculously … See. mod x y = x `mod` … Haskell: Functions —Defining Functions & Operators [1/3] To define a Haskell function, write what looks like a call to the function, an equals sign, and then an expression for what the function returns. prefix minus resolution This page outlines a design for the "unresolved infix expressions" feature requested in #4430 (closed).Parts of this page are copied from the ticket. Precedence. The issue is the sitemap definition on line 39, but GHC is happily accepting it since it knows the precedence of the (<>) and () operators from boomerang. Prefix and postfix operators of the same precedence associate to the left (i.e. My question is why. Contributing to GHC 4: Real Issues. Haskell allows infix operators to act as data constructors, which allows us to express algebraic expressions cleanly and concisely without too much mental parsing. There's a discussion about parameter descriptions in haskell-servant/servant-swagger#62. First we group the application div 2 3, … You now can set the precedence and associativity of custom infix operators. This version can be pinned in stack with:show-combinators-0.2.0.0@sha256:5d7a36c6383c9eff1dc15970da3206a05b50c2d1e93155970ffcf240eaa57d58,1277 An out-of-line declaration indicates infix precedence levels and types (well, at least out-of-line for "normal" datums). If the constructor is defined to be an infix operator, then the derived Read instance will parse only infix applications of the constructor (not the prefix form). Install the Haskell Platform or cabal + ghc.

Spalding Ultimate Basketball All Surface, Basketball Stat Sheet Pdf, Floyd Mayweather Wallpaper, Elevator Maintenance Quotation Format, The Lost Tomb Of Alexander The Great National Geographic, Belmont Abbey Calendar Fall 2021, Selective Continuation Army 2020, Sentences With Then And Than, Iop Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science Scopus Index, 2019 Oakland A's Schedule, Seven Deadly Sins Demon Colors,

Vélemény, hozzászólás?

Az email címet nem tesszük közzé. A kötelező mezőket * karakterrel jelöljük.

0-24

Annak érdekében, hogy akár hétvégén vagy éjszaka is megfelelő védelemhez juthasson, telefonos ügyeletet tartok, melynek keretében bármikor hívhat, ha segítségre van szüksége.

 Tel.: +36702062206

×
Büntetőjog

Amennyiben Önt letartóztatják, előállítják, akkor egy meggondolatlan mondat vagy ésszerűtlen döntés később az eljárás folyamán óriási hátrányt okozhat Önnek.

Tapasztalatom szerint már a kihallgatás első percei is óriási pszichikai nyomást jelentenek a terhelt számára, pedig a „tiszta fejre” és meggondolt viselkedésre ilyenkor óriási szükség van. Ez az a helyzet, ahol Ön nem hibázhat, nem kockáztathat, nagyon fontos, hogy már elsőre jól döntsön!

Védőként én nem csupán segítek Önnek az eljárás folyamán az eljárási cselekmények elvégzésében (beadvány szerkesztés, jelenlét a kihallgatásokon stb.) hanem egy kézben tartva mérem fel lehetőségeit, kidolgozom védelmének precíz stratégiáit, majd ennek alapján határozom meg azt az eszközrendszert, amellyel végig képviselhetem Önt és eredményül elérhetem, hogy semmiképp ne érje indokolatlan hátrány a büntetőeljárás következményeként.

Védőügyvédjeként én nem csupán bástyaként védem érdekeit a hatóságokkal szemben és dolgozom védelmének stratégiáján, hanem nagy hangsúlyt fektetek az Ön folyamatos tájékoztatására, egyben enyhítve esetleges kilátástalannak tűnő helyzetét is.

×
Polgári jog

Jogi tanácsadás, ügyintézés. Peren kívüli megegyezések teljes körű lebonyolítása. Megállapodások, szerződések és az ezekhez kapcsolódó dokumentációk megszerkesztése, ellenjegyzése. Bíróságok és más hatóságok előtti teljes körű jogi képviselet különösen az alábbi területeken:

×
Ingatlanjog

Ingatlan tulajdonjogának átruházáshoz kapcsolódó szerződések (adásvétel, ajándékozás, csere, stb.) elkészítése és ügyvédi ellenjegyzése, valamint teljes körű jogi tanácsadás és földhivatal és adóhatóság előtti jogi képviselet.

Bérleti szerződések szerkesztése és ellenjegyzése.

Ingatlan átminősítése során jogi képviselet ellátása.

Közös tulajdonú ingatlanokkal kapcsolatos ügyek, jogviták, valamint a közös tulajdon megszüntetésével kapcsolatos ügyekben való jogi képviselet ellátása.

Társasház alapítása, alapító okiratok megszerkesztése, társasházak állandó és eseti jogi képviselete, jogi tanácsadás.

Ingatlanokhoz kapcsolódó haszonélvezeti-, használati-, szolgalmi jog alapítása vagy megszüntetése során jogi képviselet ellátása, ezekkel kapcsolatos okiratok szerkesztése.

Ingatlanokkal kapcsolatos birtokviták, valamint elbirtoklási ügyekben való ügyvédi képviselet.

Az illetékes földhivatalok előtti teljes körű képviselet és ügyintézés.

×
Társasági jog

Cégalapítási és változásbejegyzési eljárásban, továbbá végelszámolási eljárásban teljes körű jogi képviselet ellátása, okiratok szerkesztése és ellenjegyzése

Tulajdonrész, illetve üzletrész adásvételi szerződések megszerkesztése és ügyvédi ellenjegyzése.

×
Állandó, komplex képviselet

Még mindig él a cégvezetőkben az a tévképzet, hogy ügyvédet választani egy vállalkozás vagy társaság számára elegendő akkor, ha bíróságra kell menni.

Semmivel sem árthat annyit cége nehezen elért sikereinek, mint, ha megfelelő jogi képviselet nélkül hagyná vállalatát!

Irodámban egyedi megállapodás alapján lehetőség van állandó megbízás megkötésére, melynek keretében folyamatosan együtt tudunk működni, bármilyen felmerülő kérdés probléma esetén kereshet személyesen vagy telefonon is.  Ennek nem csupán az az előnye, hogy Ön állandó ügyfelemként előnyt élvez majd időpont-egyeztetéskor, hanem ennél sokkal fontosabb, hogy az Ön cégét megismerve személyesen kezeskedem arról, hogy tevékenysége folyamatosan a törvényesség talaján maradjon. Megismerve az Ön cégének munkafolyamatait és folyamatosan együttműködve vezetőséggel a jogi tudást igénylő helyzeteket nem csupán utólag tudjuk kezelni, akkor, amikor már „ég a ház”, hanem előre felkészülve gondoskodhatunk arról, hogy Önt ne érhesse meglepetés.

×